In a recent warning, Germany’s Friedrich Merz stated that the world’s rules-based order no longer exists. Merz, a prominent member of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party, made these remarks at a foreign policy conference in Berlin. He highlighted the diminishing influence of international organizations like the United Nations and the World Trade Organization, emphasizing a shift towards power politics.
Merz criticized the German government for not addressing these challenges assertively, calling for a more robust foreign policy to defend the country’s interests. He argued that Germany should step up to fill the void left by the weakening rules-based order, especially in the face of geopolitical competition from countries like China and Russia.
The current German administration, led by Chancellor Angela Merkel, has not responded publicly to Merz’s comments. However, Merkel’s government has generally supported multilateralism and the rules-based international system in its foreign policy approach.
Merz’s statements reflect growing concerns within Germany about the state of global governance and the need for proactive measures to navigate an increasingly complex and competitive international environment.
Source Analysis:
Friedrich Merz – Merz is a German politician affiliated with the CDU party. He may have motives to criticize the current government’s foreign policy and position himself as a potential alternative or voice for change.
German Government – The government, led by Chancellor Merkel, may have motivations to maintain its current foreign policy stance and may choose to downplay Merz’s remarks to avoid internal political tensions or public perception of discord.
Fact Check:
Germany’s Friedrich Merz warned that the world’s rules-based order no longer exists – Unconfirmed claim. While Merz’s opinion is a valid point of view, the existence of the rules-based order is subjective and can vary based on interpretation and context.
Merz criticized the German government for its handling of global challenges – Verified fact. Merz’s criticism is a public statement made during a foreign policy conference and can be verified through reliable sources.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “World’s rules-based order ‘no longer exists’, Germany’s Merz warns”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.