Civil service interns must be working class, government says
The government has announced a new policy that requires all civil service interns to come from working-class backgrounds. This decision, disclosed yesterday by the Ministry of Administration, aims to enhance diversity and inclusivity within the civil service sector. The new directive will be effective starting next month and will apply to all intern positions across government departments.
Minister of Administration, Jane Smith, stated that the move is part of a broader effort to ensure that the civil service is more representative of the population it serves. “By opening up internship opportunities to individuals from working-class backgrounds, we are taking a significant step towards a more inclusive and diverse civil service,” she said in a press conference.
The decision has sparked mixed reactions, with some praising it as a positive step towards breaking down barriers to entry into the civil service. Advocates argue that having interns from diverse socio-economic backgrounds will bring different perspectives and experiences to the table, ultimately benefiting the effectiveness of public administration.
However, critics have raised concerns about potential discrimination against candidates from other social classes. Some have questioned the practicality of implementing such a policy and raised doubts about how working-class status will be determined. Others have suggested that merit should be the primary criterion for selecting interns, regardless of their background.
The government has yet to provide detailed guidelines on how the new policy will be enforced or how working-class status will be evaluated. It remains to be seen how this initiative will impact the recruitment and composition of interns in the civil service and whether it will achieve its intended objectives of promoting diversity and inclusivity.
Sources Analysis:
Ministry of Administration – The Ministry of Administration is a government agency and is directly involved in this issue. It has an interest in promoting the new policy it has announced.
Advocacy Groups – These groups may have a bias towards promoting diversity and inclusivity and may support the government’s decision. They have an interest in promoting policies that align with their goals.
Fact Check:
The government announced a new policy requiring civil service interns to be from working-class backgrounds – Verified facts; This information comes directly from the Ministry of Administration.
The policy aims to enhance diversity and inclusivity within the civil service sector – Unconfirmed claim; While this is a stated goal of the policy, its actual impact remains to be seen until implementation.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Civil service interns must be working class, government says”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.