Limiting Grok AI image edits to paid users ‘insulting’ to victims, says No 10
The decision by Grok AI, a leading image editing software company, to limit certain advanced editing features to paid users has sparked controversy, with No 10 calling the move “insulting” to victims of image-based abuse. The decision, which came into effect on Monday, affects users who are not subscribed to the company’s premium service.
In response to this change, a spokesperson for No 10 stated that this decision could potentially retraumatize victims of image-based abuse by making it harder for them to edit or modify images that may have been used against them. The spokesperson emphasized the importance of providing all users with the tools necessary to protect themselves online, regardless of their ability to pay for premium services.
Grok AI has defended its decision by stating that limiting these advanced features to paid users allows them to maintain a sustainable business model and continue developing cutting-edge technology. The company highlighted that basic editing features remain available to all users, and only a selection of more advanced tools are now restricted to premium subscribers.
The debate surrounding this issue continues to grow, with advocates for victims’ rights calling for Grok AI to reverse its decision and restore full access to image editing features for all users. Meanwhile, supporters of the company’s move argue that it is essential for businesses to monetize their services to ensure long-term viability and innovation.
The conflict between the need for companies to generate revenue and the potential impact on vulnerable users remains at the center of this discussion, raising important questions about the intersection of business interests and social responsibility in the tech industry.
Sources Analysis:
No 10 – No 10, as the official residence and office of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, may have a political bias based on the current government’s interests. In this situation, they likely advocate for policies that protect victims of image-based abuse.
Grok AI – Grok AI is directly involved in the decision to restrict certain editing features to paid users. Their goal is likely to increase revenue and ensure the sustainability of their business model.
Fact Check:
The decision to limit advanced editing features to paid users – Verified facts; Grok AI implemented this change, which is verifiable.
No 10’s statement calling the move “insulting” to victims – Unconfirmed claims; While it is a statement made by a credible source, the level of insult to victims is subjective and cannot be definitively proven.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Limiting Grok AI image edits to paid users ‘insulting’ to victims, says No 10”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.