Elon Musk’s company Grok, specializing in artificial intelligence, has recently secured a $200 million deal with the Pentagon shortly after Musk himself faced criticism for making controversial remarks related to antisemitism. The deal with the Pentagon marks a significant milestone for Grok, as it will now work on developing AI technology for military purposes. The agreement comes only days after Musk received backlash for comments that were perceived as insensitive and perpetuating stereotypes about Jewish people.
The contract with the Pentagon involves the development of advanced AI systems that will be utilized by the military for various applications. This partnership is expected to enhance the capabilities of the U.S. defense sector and contribute to technological advancements in the field.
Musk’s previous statements, which sparked the antisemitism row, are said to have originated during a public appearance where he referenced a study about the intelligence of different ethnic groups, including Jewish people. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO later apologized for his words, clarifying that they were not reflective of his true beliefs and were made in the context of discussing the study.
Both Grok and the Pentagon have affirmed their commitment to the new collaboration, emphasizing the importance of technological innovation in modern defense strategies. The deal signifies a significant opportunity for Grok to demonstrate its AI expertise on a government level and for the Pentagon to benefit from cutting-edge technology.
The timing of the agreement, following Musk’s controversial comments, has raised questions about the potential impact of personal views on business ventures. However, both parties appear focused on the future and the mutual benefits that this partnership can bring in terms of national security and technological progress.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Musk’s Grok signs $200m deal with Pentagon days after antisemitism row”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.