Guests ejected mid-stay from bankrupt hotel chain Sonder
Several guests staying at various locations of the hotel chain Sonder were abruptly asked to leave the premises mid-stay due to the company’s recent bankruptcy filing. The incidents occurred on the evening of June 15, 2023, in different cities where Sonder operates, including New York, San Francisco, and Toronto.
Sonder, a popular hospitality startup known for its tech-driven approach to short-term rentals, filed for bankruptcy after facing financial difficulties exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The company cited a significant drop in travel demand and revenue loss as the main reasons behind its insolvency.
Guests who were asked to vacate their accommodations expressed shock and frustration at the sudden eviction. Many had booked and paid for their stays in advance and were left scrambling to find alternative lodging at short notice. Some reported difficulties in reaching customer service representatives for assistance.
In response, Sonder issued a statement expressing regret for the inconvenience caused to the affected guests. The company outlined that the decision to ask guests to leave was necessary to ensure orderly wind-down proceedings as part of the bankruptcy process. Sonder promised to refund guests for the unused portion of their bookings and offered assistance in finding alternative accommodations.
The situation has sparked criticism from consumer rights advocates, who argue that guests should have been given more advance notice and support in finding new accommodations. The incident also raises questions about the obligations of hospitality businesses towards customers in such circumstances.
The evictions highlight the challenges faced by companies in the travel and hospitality sector as they navigate the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their operations and finances.
Sources Analysis:
– Sonder: The company has a vested interest in managing its public image during the bankruptcy process. Their statement may be aimed at mitigating negative perceptions and maintaining customer trust.
– Guests: Guests have firsthand experience of being asked to leave Sonder properties. Their accounts provide valuable insights into the impact of the evictions on individuals.
Fact Check:
– Guests were asked to leave mid-stay: Verified fact. Multiple guests have reported being asked to leave their accommodations before their planned departure date.
– Sonder filed for bankruptcy: Verified fact. The company officially announced its bankruptcy filing.
– Guests faced challenges reaching customer service: Unconfirmed claim. While reported by some guests, this information cannot be independently verified.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Guests ejected mid-stay from bankrupt hotel chain Sonder”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.