Trump peace plan ‘ignores interests of Palestinian people’, Hamas official tells BBC
A senior Hamas official criticized President Trump’s Middle East peace plan, alleging it disregards the interests of the Palestinian people. Speaking to the BBC on condition of anonymity, the official claimed that the plan, which was unveiled on Tuesday, sidelines Palestinians and favors Israel. The proposal includes the annexation of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and the recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s undivided capital.
The Hamas official argued that the plan fails to address key Palestinian demands, such as the right of return for refugees and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state based on pre-1967 borders. The official also voiced concerns that the plan would solidify Israeli control over Palestinian territories and perpetuate the status quo of occupation.
President Trump has described his proposal as a “win-win” for both Israelis and Palestinians, emphasizing the economic opportunities it could bring to the region. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has expressed support for the plan, calling it a “historic breakthrough” for Israel’s security and future.
The Hamas official’s comments reflect the deep-seated divide between Palestinian factions and the international community over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. While some believe the peace plan could pave the way for negotiations, others, like Hamas, view it as a one-sided initiative that disregards Palestinian aspirations for statehood and self-determination.
Both Israeli and Palestinian leaders have been invited to Washington to discuss the details of the plan, but the Palestinian Authority has already rejected the proposal, raising doubts about the feasibility of any potential peace talks in the near future.
Sources Analysis:
BBC – known for its impartial reporting, but might face criticism for alleged pro-Western bias. Its interest lies in providing accurate information to the public.
Hamas official – affiliated with Hamas, a Palestinian group labeled as a terrorist organization by some countries. The official’s goal is likely to represent the interests of Hamas and the Palestinian people.
Fact Check:
The criticism of the peace plan by the Hamas official – Verified facts; The unveiling of Trump’s Middle East peace plan – Verified facts; Trump describing the plan as a “win-win” – Verified facts.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Trump peace plan ‘ignores interests of Palestinian people’, Hamas official tells BBC”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.