What Happened:
International Criminal Court (ICC) judges are currently hearing charges against former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte for alleged crimes against humanity. The charges relate to Duterte’s violent crackdown on drugs during his time in office, which resulted in thousands of deaths.
The ICC prosecutor’s office claims that Duterte actively promoted and instigated the killings of suspected drug users and dealers, creating a culture of impunity that led to widespread human rights violations. The prosecution argues that these actions amount to crimes against humanity under international law.
Duterte and his supporters, on the other hand, have denied these accusations, stating that the drug war was a legitimate government campaign to combat the drug trade and improve public safety in the Philippines. They argue that the ICC lacks jurisdiction over the case since the country has officially withdrawn from the court.
The hearings at the ICC will determine whether there is enough evidence to proceed with a full trial against Duterte. If the court decides to move forward, it could have significant implications not only for Duterte but also for the Philippines as a whole. It will test the country’s commitment to upholding human rights and the rule of law, both domestically and on the international stage.
Sources Analysis:
ICC – The International Criminal Court is an international tribunal that tries individuals accused of the most serious crimes of international concern. While the ICC aims to be impartial, it has faced criticism for disproportionately targeting African leaders, raising concerns about bias.
Rodrigo Duterte – As the subject of the investigation, Duterte has a vested interest in discrediting the charges against him to avoid potential legal consequences. His statements should be considered in this context.
Fact Check:
The fact that the ICC is hearing charges against former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte is a verified fact as it is widely reported by reputable news sources and confirmed by official ICC statements. The claims made by the ICC prosecutor’s office about Duterte promoting killings are unconfirmed claims, as they are allegations that have not yet been proven in court.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “What’s at stake as ICC judges hear charges against ex-Philippine president Duterte?”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.