Indian Couple Faces Skin Color Backlash After Wedding Video Goes Viral

An Indian couple has recently faced backlash and online trolling over their skin color following the viral spread of their wedding video. The incident took place in New Delhi, India, after the couple’s wedding video was shared on social media platforms. The video showcased the couple during their marriage ceremony, with many users focusing on the stark contrast in their skin tones.

The couple, identified as Priya and Ankit, found themselves at the receiving end of derogatory comments and racial remarks related to their skin colors. While some netizens criticized Priya for her dark skin tone compared to Ankit’s fair complexion, others targeted Ankit for his choice of partner. The trolling quickly escalated, with many resorting to body shaming and discriminatory comments.

In response, the couple released a statement expressing their disappointment at the online trolling and highlighting the need to move past such superficial judgments. They emphasized the importance of love and compatibility over physical appearances, urging people to celebrate diversity and embrace differences.

The incident has sparked a debate on social media about colorism and beauty standards prevalent in Indian society. Many users have come out in support of the couple, condemning the trolls and calling for a more inclusive and accepting society.

The online trolling of the Indian couple over their skin color highlights the persisting issue of colorism and discrimination based on appearance. The incident serves as a reminder of the harmful impact of such prejudices and the importance of promoting acceptance and diversity in society.

Sources Analysis:
Social Media Platforms – There is a potential for bias and misinformation on social media platforms, as users can comment anonymously and without accountability. These platforms may have diverse motives, including personal biases and the desire for attention or controversy.

Fact Check:
Priya and Ankit faced online trolling – Verified facts. The incident of online trolling against the couple is well-documented and can be verified through the couple’s statement and social media posts.
Debate on colorism and beauty standards – Unconfirmed claims. While there is evidence of a debate on social media, the extent and impact of this discussion may vary and are subjective to individual experiences and opinions.

Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Indian couple trolled over skin colour after wedding video goes viral”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.

Scroll to Top