The International Criminal Court (ICC) has charged Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte with crimes against humanity. The charges stem from his administration’s brutal anti-drug campaign, which has resulted in thousands of extrajudicial killings since Duterte took office in June 2016.
The ICC prosecutor alleges that Duterte, along with other senior officials, has been directly involved in orchestrating the killings of drug suspects as part of the government’s aggressive crackdown. The court’s decision comes after a preliminary examination that began in February 2018.
Duterte has been a controversial figure both domestically and internationally for his hardline stance on drugs. He has openly endorsed the killing of drug dealers and users, promising to protect police officers from prosecution if they are charged with human rights violations in the course of carrying out his anti-drug policies.
The Philippine government has repeatedly denied allegations of systematic human rights abuses and maintains that the drug war is necessary to combat the country’s drug problem. Duterte’s spokesperson has called the ICC’s decision a “legally erroneous conclusion” and reiterated that the administration will not cooperate with the investigation.
This move by the ICC marks a significant development in holding a head of state accountable for alleged crimes committed under his leadership. It remains to be seen how the Philippine government and Duterte will respond to the charges brought against him.
Sources Analysis:
ICC – The ICC is a judicial institution, not known for bias. Its goal is to hold individuals accountable for atrocities when a country is unable or unwilling to do so. The ICC is directly involved in this case and has an interest in ensuring justice for the alleged victims.
Philippine Government – The Philippine government has a vested interest in defending Duterte and denying any allegations of human rights abuses to protect its reputation and legitimacy. The government is directly involved in this case.
Fact Check:
The fact that the ICC has charged Duterte with crimes against humanity is a verified fact based on the court’s official statement and public records.
The statement that Duterte has openly endorsed the killing of drug dealers and users is a verified fact supported by his public speeches and remarks.
The denial of allegations of human rights abuses by the Philippine government is a statement that cannot be independently verified as it is based on the government’s claims without external evidence.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “ICC charges Rodrigo Duterte with crimes against humanity”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.