International students face financial burden complying with Trump administration visa deadline

I spent $8,000 to get back to US after Trump visa deadline

A group of international students found themselves in a challenging situation when faced with the visa deadline changes implemented by the Trump administration. The students, hailing from various countries around the world, were studying in the United States when the new visa regulations were announced.

With the sudden deadline to leave the country, many students faced the tough decision of either returning to their home countries or finding alternatives to remain in the US legally. Among them was a group of students who decided to comply with the new regulations and depart from the US.

To meet the deadline and comply with the visa regulations, these students had to navigate the logistical and financial hurdles of international travel during a global pandemic. Flights were limited, ticket prices were inflated, and quarantine requirements added to the complexity of the situation.

One student shared that they had to spend $8,000 on flight tickets and quarantine expenses to return to the US before the visa deadline expired. The hefty sum was a considerable burden on the student and their family but was deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the new regulations.

The Trump administration’s motive behind the visa deadline changes was to prioritize American workers during the economic recovery from the pandemic. While the students understood the government’s stance, the abrupt implementation of the new regulations put them in a difficult position.

As the students settled back into their studies in the US, the financial and emotional toll of the visa deadline ordeal remained. Their experiences shed light on the complexities faced by international students amidst changing visa regulations and global uncertainties.

Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “I spent $8,000 to get back to US after Trump visa deadline”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.

Scroll to Top