I invested £12,000 in Brewdog – I think I’ve lost it all
What Happened
An investor, who preferred to remain anonymous, revealed that they had invested £12,000 in the popular brewery company Brewdog, expressing concerns that the investment might be lost. The individual claimed to have purchased shares in Brewdog in 2018, but recent reports about the company’s financial difficulties have raised doubts about the investment’s viability. Brewdog, founded in 2007 in Scotland, has gained popularity for its craft beers and innovative marketing strategies. However, the company faced criticism for its workplace culture and treatment of employees, leading to internal challenges.
The investor’s unease stems from Brewdog’s reported financial struggles, with losses amounting to £13.1 million in 2019 and a further £7.4 million in 2020. Additionally, the company faced backlash for its alleged toxic work environment and aggressive corporate persona, which contradicted its initial image as a consumer-friendly brand. Brewdog, on the other hand, has acknowledged its past mistakes and pledged to improve its corporate culture and financial performance. The company remains optimistic about its future prospects, citing plans to focus on sustainable growth and ethical business practices.
Sources Analysis
The investor – The investor may have a financial interest in the performance of Brewdog shares and could be biased towards a negative portrayal of the company’s situation.
Brewdog – As a direct party involved, Brewdog may have a vested interest in downplaying any negative reports and emphasizing its commitment to improvement.
Fact Check
Investment of £12,000 in Brewdog – Unconfirmed claims. The exact amount and nature of the investment are based on the investor’s statement and cannot be independently verified.
Brewdog reported losses of £13.1 million in 2019 and £7.4 million in 2020 – Verified facts. Financial reports are official data that can be verified through Brewdog’s public records and financial statements.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “I invested £12,000 in Brewdog – I think I’ve lost it all”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.