‘Don’t take us to a hospital’: Iran protesters treated in secret to avoid arrest
Several reports have emerged from Iran indicating that protesters injured during recent demonstrations are being treated in secret to avoid arrest by authorities. The protests, sparked by a range of economic and political grievances, have led to clashes between demonstrators and security forces across multiple cities in Iran.
Activists and medical professionals have stated that those injured in the protests are fearful of seeking treatment at hospitals due to the risk of arrest. To address this issue, a network of medical professionals and volunteers has reportedly been providing covert medical assistance to protesters, treating their injuries in safe locations away from official medical facilities.
Iranian authorities have not directly commented on these reports. However, the government has previously been accused of cracking down on dissent by targeting individuals involved in protests. The fear of arrest and persecution has led many to seek alternative means of medical treatment to avoid detection.
The situation remains tense as protests continue in various parts of the country, with demonstrators demanding accountability, transparency, and improved living conditions. The covert medical assistance being provided highlights the challenges faced by those seeking to exercise their right to protest in a restrictive environment.
As the unrest unfolds, the delicate balance between the right to peaceful assembly and the government’s security concerns remains a key issue in Iran.
Sources Analysis:
Local Activists – Activists on the ground may have a bias against the government and could be motivated to portray the authorities in a negative light to garner support for the protesters.
Medical Professionals – Medical professionals involved in treating the protesters may have a humanitarian interest in providing care to those in need, but their statements could be influenced by their opposition to government policies.
Fact Check:
Protesters avoiding hospitals – Unconfirmed claims. While there are reports suggesting protesters are avoiding hospitals, this information is challenging to verify independently due to the covert nature of the actions.
Government crackdown on dissent – Verified facts. The Iranian government has a history of suppressing dissent, making it plausible that protesters would fear arrest if seeking medical treatment openly.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘Don’t take us to a hospital’: Iran protesters treated in secret to avoid arrest”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.