‘I saw people getting shot’: Eyewitness tells of Iran protest crackdown
Amid ongoing protests in Iran over economic hardships and political grievances, a recent crackdown by security forces has left a grim mark on the dissent. Eyewitnesses have come forward to recount the brutal suppression that unfolded in the streets of Tehran on the afternoon of October 15th.
Reports indicate that security forces, including police and members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, used tear gas and live ammunition to disperse the protesters. The situation quickly escalated into violence, with many protesters injured and some reportedly killed.
One eyewitness, who preferred to remain anonymous for safety reasons, described the scene as chaotic and terrifying. “I saw people getting shot right in front of me. The sound of gunfire filled the air, and there was panic everywhere,” the eyewitness said.
The Iranian government has defended its actions, claiming that the protests were illegal and fueled by foreign enemies seeking to destabilize the country. Officials have accused the protesters of being “rioters” and have vowed to take strong measures to restore order.
Protesters, on the other hand, argue that they are simply demanding their rights and are fed up with corruption and mismanagement by the authorities. They have called for transparency, accountability, and meaningful reforms to address the economic challenges facing ordinary Iranians.
The crackdown has drawn international condemnation, with human rights organizations urging Iranian authorities to respect the rights of peaceful protesters and exercise restraint. The United Nations has called for an independent investigation into the use of force against civilians.
As the situation in Iran remains tense, with protests continuing in various parts of the country, the future remains uncertain. The clash between authorities and protesters shows no signs of abating, raising concerns about further violence and potential human rights abuses.
Source Analysis:
Eyewitness – The eyewitness is likely to provide a firsthand and potentially biased perspective on the events since they experienced them directly. Their safety concerns may influence the details they choose to disclose.
Government officials – Iranian government officials may have a vested interest in justifying their actions and discrediting the protesters to maintain their grip on power. Their statements should be critically analyzed for potential biases.
Protesters – The protesters have a clear motive to highlight grievances and push for reforms. Their statements may reflect a desire to garner public support and sympathy for their cause.
Fact Check:
Eyewitness account – Unconfirmed claims – While the testimony of the eyewitness provides crucial insights, the details shared cannot be independently verified.
Use of tear gas and live ammunition by security forces – Verified facts – Multiple sources and videos confirm the use of these measures by Iranian security forces.
International condemnation – Verified facts – Various human rights organizations and the United Nations have indeed criticized the Iranian government’s response to the protests.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘I saw people getting shot’: Eyewitness tells of Iran protest crackdown”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.