Report those who celebrate Charlie Kirk death to employers, Vance says
Conservative lawyer and political commentator, Charlie Kirk, found himself engulfed in controversy after Bryan Dean Wright, a former CIA officer, posted on Twitter that some people had expressed joy at the news of Kirk’s reported death due to a car accident. The incident occurred on social media platforms on September 15, 2022.
In response to the disturbing reaction to Kirk’s alleged passing, Republican Senate candidate for Ohio, J.D. Vance, took to Twitter to condemn the celebratory responses. Vance urged individuals to report those who were engaging in such behavior to their employers. He stated, “If you’re an employer and you see your employees celebrating the death of their political opponents, you should know immediately. We cannot allow this to become the norm.”
On the other hand, supporters of free speech and civil liberties have raised concerns about Vance’s statement, pointing out potential issues of policing and potentially infringing on individuals’ rights to express their opinions, regardless of how distasteful they may be.
The incident underscores the broader challenge of navigating free speech and the boundaries of acceptable discourse in the increasingly polarized landscape of online interactions, particularly within the realm of political commentary.
In light of these events, it remains to be seen how social media platforms and employers may choose to address such instances of online conduct and whether Vance’s call to report individuals will gain traction or face pushback from those advocating for free expression.
Sources:
Bryan Dean Wright Twitter – The source has a generally neutral online presence and does not have a history of spreading misinformation.
J.D. Vance Twitter – Vance is a Republican Senate candidate, and his statement may be viewed in the context of his political campaign, potentially shaping public opinion in his favor.
Fact Check:
The reported celebration of Charlie Kirk’s death on social media – Unconfirmed claims. While the initial tweet by Bryan Dean Wright alleged such reactions, the accuracy and extent of these celebrations remain unverified.
J.D. Vance’s call to report individuals celebrating Kirk’s death to their employers – Verified facts. Vance’s Twitter post can be directly accessed and confirmed.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Report those who celebrate Charlie Kirk death to employers, Vance says”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.