Ex-Bangladesh leader authorised deadly crackdown, leaked audio suggests
A leaked audio recording suggests that an ex-leader of Bangladesh authorized a deadly crackdown on opposition protests back in 2018. The recording features a voice believed to be that of the former leader discussing the use of force to suppress the demonstrations, which resulted in numerous fatalities. The events unfolded in the capital city of Dhaka, Bangladesh, during the protests held by opposition groups calling for political reforms.
According to the leaked audio, the ex-leader can be heard instructing officials to take harsh measures to disperse the protesters, even if it leads to casualties. The voice purported to be the ex-leader’s indicates a willingness to use violence to maintain order and control the situation.
The opposition parties have condemned the revelations, calling for accountability and justice for the victims of the crackdown. They argue that the leaked audio is proof of the former leader’s authoritarian tendencies and disregard for human rights.
On the other hand, supporters of the ex-leader claim that the actions were necessary to prevent chaos and instability in the country. They argue that the protests were a threat to national security and required a firm response to maintain peace.
The leaked audio has sparked outrage among the public, with many demanding a thorough investigation into the events of 2018. Calls for transparency and accountability in governance have intensified following the release of the recording.
The ex-leader in question has not commented on the authenticity of the audio recording or the allegations made against them.
Sources Analysis:
– Leaked audio recording: The source could have a bias against the ex-leader, seeking to tarnish their reputation.
– Opposition parties: Likely have a bias against the ex-leader, aiming to use this revelation for political gain.
– Supporters of the ex-leader: May have a bias in favor of the ex-leader, seeking to justify their actions.
Fact Check:
– The existence of the leaked audio recording is a verified fact based on reports and statements.
– The identity of the voice in the recording has not been independently verified and remains an unconfirmed claim.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Ex-Bangladesh leader authorised deadly crackdown, leaked audio suggests”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.