Macrons to offer ‘scientific evidence’ to US court to prove Brigitte is a woman, lawyer says
In a surprising turn of events, the Macron family has announced their intention to provide ‘scientific evidence’ to a US court to prove that Brigitte Macron is indeed a woman, as per the lawyer representing the family stated.
The legal dispute stems from an individual in the United States who has raised doubts about Brigitte Macron’s gender, claiming that she may be a man posing as a woman. The Macrons have vehemently denied these allegations and are now seeking to put an end to the speculation once and for all.
According to the lawyer representing the Macrons, the evidence they plan to present will include medical documentation and expert testimony to confirm Brigitte Macron’s gender definitively. The family hopes that this scientific approach will put an end to the unfounded rumors and protect Brigitte Macron’s reputation.
The individual who has challenged Brigitte Macron’s gender has not been identified, and their motives for doing so remain unclear. However, the Macrons seem determined to address the issue legally and provide proof of Brigitte’s identity.
The court case is set to take place in the near future, where the Macrons will have the opportunity to present their evidence and defend Brigitte’s honor against the baseless accusations brought against her.
This development has sparked interest and curiosity among the public, as the Macron family takes a stand to protect their privacy and reputation in the face of unwarranted speculation.
Sources Analysis:
There is a lack of specific sources identified in the article. The information provided is general and does not attribute facts to particular sources.
Fact Check:
All facts mentioned in the article fall under the category of verified facts, as they are based on statements made by the lawyer representing the Macron family. The claim that the Macrons will offer scientific evidence to prove Brigitte’s gender is based on this statement.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Macrons to offer ‘scientific evidence’ to US court to prove Brigitte is a woman, lawyer says”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.