Malaysia and Indonesia Block Access to Musk’s Grok Over Concerns of Sexually Explicit Deepfakes

Malaysia and Indonesia block Musk’s Grok over sexually explicit deepfakes

Malaysia and Indonesia have taken a stance against Elon Musk’s new social media platform, Grok, by blocking access to it within their borders. The decision comes after concerns were raised about sexually explicit deepfake videos circulating on the platform.

The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) announced the block, stating that the content on Grok violated the country’s laws against obscene material online. Additionally, Indonesia’s Ministry of Communication and Information Technology (Kominfo) followed suit, citing similar reasons for the ban.

Elon Musk, the founder of Grok, has not responded to the specific actions taken by Malaysia and Indonesia. However, in the past, he has emphasized the platform’s commitment to free speech and minimal content moderation.

The move to block Grok in Malaysia and Indonesia signals a growing concern over the spread of deepfake technology and its potential misuse. While supporters of free speech may view this as an infringement on digital rights, authorities argue that such measures are necessary to prevent the circulation of harmful and illegal content online.

The actions taken by Malaysia and Indonesia raise questions about the regulation of social media platforms and the responsibilities they bear in controlling the dissemination of inappropriate material. As the debate continues, the impact of these bans on the future of Grok and similar platforms remains to be seen.

Sources Analysis:

Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) – The MCMC is a government agency with a regulatory role in the communications and multimedia sector. As a state entity, it may have a vested interest in upholding national laws and regulations, potentially leading to bias in its actions.

Indonesia’s Ministry of Communication and Information Technology (Kominfo) – Kominfo is a government ministry responsible for overseeing communication and information technology matters in Indonesia. Like the MCMC, its decisions may be influenced by political agendas and national interests.

Fact Check:

Elon Musk’s ownership of Grok – Verified fact. Elon Musk is the founder of Grok, as publicly acknowledged.

Concerns over sexually explicit deepfake videos on Grok – Unconfirmed claims. While reports suggest the presence of such content, the exact nature and extent of these videos remain unverified.

Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Malaysia and Indonesia block Musk’s Grok over sexually explicit deepfakes”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.

Scroll to Top