Malaysia and Indonesia have taken a firm stance against the controversial app Grok, developed by Elon Musk’s AI company OpenAI, due to concerns over sexually explicit deepfakes. The app, which utilizes advanced artificial intelligence technology to create realistic-looking deepfake videos, has sparked outrage in the two Southeast Asian countries.
Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Minister, Saifuddin Abdullah, stated that the government is blocking access to Grok to prevent the spread of harmful content that could potentially violate laws and societal norms. Similarly, Indonesia’s Ministry of Communication and Information Technology announced that they are restricting access to the app within the country.
The decision to block Grok comes after reports of the app being used to create pornographic deepfake videos of individuals without their consent, raising serious ethical and legal concerns. Both Malaysia and Indonesia have laws in place to combat pornography and protect their citizens from explicit content.
OpenAI has not released an official statement regarding the actions taken by Malaysia and Indonesia. However, the company has previously emphasized the importance of using AI technology ethically and responsibly to prevent misuse.
The move to block Grok reflects a growing global concern over the potential misuse of deepfake technology to spread misinformation, create non-consensual explicit content, and undermine trust in visual media. As AI technology continues to advance, governments and tech companies face the challenge of balancing innovation with the protection of individuals’ rights and societal values.
Sources Analysis:
Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Minister, Saifuddin Abdullah – The minister is likely motivated by upholding the country’s laws and protecting its citizens from harmful content.
Indonesia’s Ministry of Communication and Information Technology – The ministry’s decision aligns with Indonesia’s efforts to regulate online content and protect societal values.
OpenAI – The company may have a vested interest in addressing the concerns raised by Malaysia and Indonesia to maintain a positive reputation and prevent further regulatory action.
Fact Check:
The decision to block Grok by Malaysia and Indonesia – Verified facts, based on official statements and government announcements.
Reports of Grok being used for creating pornographic deepfake videos – Unconfirmed claims, as specifics of such incidents may vary, but the general concern is acknowledged in various reports.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Malaysia and Indonesia block Musk’s Grok over sexually explicit deepfakes”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.