Outrage after Indian man drowns in open pit after begging for help for hours
A tragic incident has sparked outrage in India after a man drowned in an open pit despite pleading for help for hours in the Katihar district of Bihar. The victim, identified as a 35-year-old man named Ravi Kumar, reportedly fell into the pit while collecting water from a hand pump in the village of Kurkuri on Monday evening.
Eyewitnesses claim that Ravi Kumar desperately cried out for assistance for several hours, but no help arrived in time to save him. Locals allege that emergency services were contacted multiple times, but the response was delayed, leading to the devastating outcome.
Authorities have promised an investigation into the incident to determine the cause of the delay in the rescue efforts. The police have stated that they are looking into the matter seriously and will take appropriate action based on the findings of the investigation.
The heartbreaking incident has sparked anger among the community, with many questioning the effectiveness of emergency response systems in rural areas. Calls for accountability and better emergency services have been growing following this tragic event.
The family of Ravi Kumar is devastated by the loss and is demanding justice for their loved one. They have urged the authorities to ensure that such negligence does not occur again and that proper measures are taken to prevent similar tragedies in the future.
The incident has once again highlighted the challenges faced by many in rural India, where access to timely emergency services can often be a matter of life and death.
Sources Analysis:
Eyewitnesses – Eyewitnesses may have a bias towards sensationalizing the events they witnessed.
Authorities – Authorities may have an interest in downplaying any negligence on their part and emphasizing their commitment to investigating the matter seriously.
Fact Check:
Eyewitness claims – Unconfirmed claims. While eyewitness testimony can be valuable, it can also be influenced by emotions and perceptions.
Authorities’ promise of investigation – Verified facts. The statement can be independently confirmed by official sources.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Outrage after Indian man drowns in open pit after begging for help for hours”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.