A 32-year-old Indian man named Mohammad Akhlaq was lynched by a mob in the Dadri area of Uttar Pradesh on September 28, 2015, over rumors that he had stored and consumed beef in his house. The incident took place late at night in Akhlaq’s village. The mob of villagers broke into his home, beat him to death, and severely injured his son, who was also present.
Since the horrific incident, Akhlaq’s family has been fighting for justice, seeking punishment for those responsible for the senseless killing. They have expressed their commitment to continue the legal battle despite facing challenges and threats. The family has maintained that Akhlaq was innocent and that the allegations against him were false.
On the other hand, the accused in the case, including a local priest and several villagers, claim that they were provoked by rumors of cow slaughter and acted in the heat of the moment. Some of them have alleged that they were misled by certain groups who spread false information to incite violence.
The case has sparked national and international outrage, highlighting issues of religious intolerance and vigilante violence in India. The legal proceedings have been ongoing, with some witnesses retracting their statements under alleged pressure.
As the legal process continues, Akhlaq’s family remains steadfast in their pursuit of justice, hoping that those responsible for the brutal attack will be held accountable for their actions.
Sources Analysis:
Major Indian media outlets – tend to have political affiliations and may have biases based on their owners’ interests or government relationships.
Local eyewitnesses – may be influenced by community dynamics or pressure to align their testimonies with prevailing narratives.
Human rights organizations – may have a bias towards highlighting issues of violence and discrimination to further their advocacy goals.
Political parties – likely to use the incident for their own agendas, either by condemning the attack or justifying it based on ideological leanings.
Fact Check:
The lynching of Mohammad Akhlaq – Verified fact, widely reported by multiple sources.
Rumors of beef consumption triggering the attack – Unconfirmed claims, based on witness testimonies and local reports.
Family’s commitment to seeking justice – Verified fact, based on statements made by the family members.
Accused claiming provocation through false information – Unconfirmed claims, need further investigation for verification.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Family of Indian man lynched over beef rumours vows to keep fighting for justice”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.