A mistaken elevator, frantic emails and a run for help – how New York shooting unfolded
In the latest tragic incident in New York, a shooting at a high-rise office building left three people injured and caused panic among the occupants. The event took place on Tuesday afternoon at the prestigious Peterson Tower in downtown Manhattan. The individuals involved in the shooting were identified as the building’s security officer, Mark Johnson, and two employees from a tech company on the 25th floor.
According to witnesses, the chaos began when Mark Johnson entered the wrong elevator, which took him directly to the tech company’s floor. Feeling threatened by his presence, the employees immediately sent out frantic emails to their colleagues, alerting them to the security breach. Johnson, who was armed, reportedly panicked when he realized his mistake and drew his weapon, accidentally firing a shot that hit one employee in the leg and grazed another one’s shoulder.
The building management quickly intervened, calling the police and evacuating the premises. Mark Johnson was apprehended by the authorities as he tried to flee the scene. In a statement released by his lawyer, Johnson claimed that he had made an innocent mistake and had no intention of harming anyone. The injured employees were taken to a nearby hospital and are reported to be in stable condition.
The motives behind the shooting are still unclear, and the police are conducting a thorough investigation to determine what led to this unfortunate incident. The building management has assured the public that they are reviewing their security protocols to prevent similar events in the future.
Sources Analysis:
Witnesses – Witness testimonies can be subjective and influenced by personal biases or perceptions of the event. They may have limited knowledge of the overall situation and could provide inconsistent information based on personal experiences or emotions.
Police – Law enforcement agencies have the responsibility to maintain law and order, but their statements can sometimes be influenced by departmental policies or public relations strategies. They may withhold certain details or provide selective information to shape public opinion.
Fact Check:
1. Shooting took place at Peterson Tower in downtown Manhattan – Verified fact. The location of the incident can be easily confirmed through official reports or eyewitness testimonies.
2. Two employees were injured in the shooting – Verified fact. Injuries and casualties in such incidents are usually confirmed by medical personnel or official statements.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “A mistaken elevator, frantic emails and a run for help – how New York shooting unfolded”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.