Jihadists have caused a nation to grind to a halt with their fuel blockade, impacting the lives of millions of citizens. The blockade, led by the militant group known as the Red Swords, began on Monday morning in the capital city of Alphastan. The Red Swords have demanded the immediate release of their imprisoned leader, along with a ransom of $10 million to end the blockade.
Government officials have condemned the actions of the Red Swords, labeling them as terrorists who are holding the country hostage. The Interior Minister has stated that the government will not negotiate with terrorists and is considering all options to resolve the situation, including a potential military intervention.
Citizens across the nation have been left stranded without access to essential services such as transportation, heating, and electricity. Hospitals are experiencing shortages of medical supplies, and businesses are unable to operate without fuel for their generators.
The Red Swords have justified their actions as a means of protest against the government’s crackdown on their organization and the alleged human rights abuses committed by security forces. They have vowed to continue the blockade until their demands are met.
The situation remains tense, with ongoing negotiations between government officials and representatives of the Red Swords. As the standoff continues, the nation remains at a standstill, with no immediate resolution in sight.
Sources Analysis:
Government sources – The government has a clear bias against the Red Swords and is motivated to maintain law and order. Their statements need to be carefully verified for accuracy.
Red Swords spokesperson – The militant group has a history of promoting its agenda through violence. Their statements should be viewed with caution and may be aimed at furthering their objectives.
Independent observers – Neutral parties without a direct stake in the conflict are likely to provide more objective insights into the situation.
Fact Check:
Government condemnation of Red Swords – Verified facts, as these statements can be confirmed through official government releases.
Demand for ransom – Unconfirmed claims, as the exact amount and nature of the ransom demand may vary depending on sources.
Citizens stranded without essential services – Verified facts, as the impact of the fuel blockade on the population can be observed and reported by various sources.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “How jihadists have brought a nation to a standstill with their fuel blockade”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.