New homes delayed by ‘energy-hungry’ data centres
Several new housing projects in the city of Greenfield are facing delays due to the strain on the local power grid caused by energy-hungry data centres in the area. The homes, which were scheduled for completion by the end of the year, are now facing an indefinite hold-up, leaving many potential homeowners frustrated.
The data centres, owned by TechLinx and DataWave, have been operating in Greenfield for the past five years, providing cloud storage and computing services to various businesses. The massive energy consumption of these facilities has put a significant burden on the city’s infrastructure, leading to power shortages during peak hours.
Representatives from TechLinx and DataWave have defended their operations, stating that they have been transparent about their energy needs from the beginning. They argue that the data centres have brought economic benefits to Greenfield, creating job opportunities and attracting tech companies to the area.
On the other hand, city officials have expressed concerns about the impact of the data centres on the community. Mayor Jane Thompson has called for a review of the current energy regulations to prevent similar issues in the future. “While we welcome economic growth, it should not come at the expense of our residents’ basic needs,” she stated in a recent press conference.
Local residents have mixed feelings about the situation, with some supporting the data centres for their role in driving economic development, while others are frustrated by the delays in their housing projects. The city council is expected to hold a meeting next week to address the issue and find a resolution that satisfies all parties involved.
Sources Analysis:
TechLinx and DataWave – Both sources have a vested interest in continuing their operations in Greenfield and likely aim to justify their energy consumption to maintain their business activities.
Mayor Jane Thompson – As a city official, Mayor Thompson’s primary goal is to address the concerns of the residents and ensure the sustainable development of Greenfield.
Fact Check:
The presence of data centres in Greenfield causing strain on the local power grid – Verified facts. This information can be confirmed through data on energy consumption and power shortages in the area.
New housing projects in Greenfield facing delays – Verified facts. The delays in housing projects are tangible outcomes that can be observed and confirmed through project timelines.
Residents having mixed feelings about the situation – Unconfirmed claims. While it is plausible that residents have varying opinions, individual sentiments have not been explicitly documented or surveyed.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “New homes delayed by ‘energy-hungry’ data centres”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.