Students at Oakridge University have raised concerns over the unexpected rise in their energy bills after the installation of a new “unlimited” energy system on campus. The students claim that the promised benefits of the system have not materialized as expected, and they are now facing additional costs of up to £2,000 per year.
The new energy system, which was touted as a sustainable and cost-effective solution by the university administration, was supposed to provide unlimited energy to the campus without any extra charges to the students. However, after its implementation last semester, students have noticed a significant increase in their utility bills, contrary to what was initially communicated.
In response to the students’ complaints, the university released a statement acknowledging the issue and attributing it to a miscalculation in the initial estimation of energy usage. The administration assured students that they are working to rectify the situation and find a fair solution for all those affected by the unexpected surge in costs.
The students, represented by the Oakridge University Student Union, have demanded transparency from the administration regarding the energy system’s costs and operation. They are calling for a review of the billing process and a reassessment of the energy system to ensure that it aligns with the initial promises made to the student body.
The university has committed to holding a town hall meeting next week to address the students’ concerns and provide more information about the steps being taken to resolve the issue.
This development has sparked a debate on campus about the accountability of the university administration and the importance of clear communication in such initiatives that have a direct impact on students’ finances.
Source Analysis:
Oakridge University Student Union – The student union may have a vested interest in representing the student body’s concerns and advocating for their rights in this situation.
Oakridge University Administration – The administration may be motivated to downplay the issue or provide explanations that absolve them of any wrongdoing.
Fact Check:
The increase in students’ energy bills after the installation of the new energy system – Verified fact. This information is based on the students’ firsthand accounts.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Students say ‘unlimited’ energy costing £2k more”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.