Octopus Energy, a major UK-based energy supplier, has announced its decision to spin off its tech arm Kraken in a deal valued at $8.65 billion. The move, set to take place next month, aims to position Kraken as a standalone entity focused on developing innovative software for the energy sector.
Octopus Energy, known for its green energy solutions and technological advancements in the industry, has stated that the spin-off will allow Kraken to further expand its operations and offerings. The tech arm is behind many of Octopus Energy’s digital platforms, including its customer service chatbots and data analytics tools.
While Octopus Energy will retain a minority stake in Kraken, the majority will be owned by existing and new investors. This separation is anticipated to provide Kraken with the independence and resources needed to drive its growth and explore new opportunities in the ever-evolving energy market.
The CEO of Octopus Energy, who also serves as the chair of Kraken, expressed confidence in the decision, highlighting the potential for Kraken to thrive as a separate entity. The company’s dedication to leveraging technology to transform the energy industry is expected to continue through this strategic move.
The spin-off of Kraken marks a significant development in the energy sector, underscoring the growing importance of technological innovation in shaping its future landscape.
Sources Analysis:
Octopus Energy – The company may have a vested interest in portraying the spin-off positively to attract investors and maintain a favorable market image.
Fact Check:
The announcement of the spin-off – Verified fact. The information is based on the official statement released by Octopus Energy.
The valuation of the deal at $8.65 billion – Unconfirmed claim. While this figure is provided, it may be subject to change until the deal is finalized.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Octopus Energy to spin off $8.65bn tech arm Kraken”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.