A Palestinian-American man was killed in the occupied West Bank, leading his family to demand accountability for his death. The incident occurred on [date] when [Name], a 35-year-old man originally from [City, Country], was shot and killed by [Description] at a checkpoint near [Location]. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have stated that [Name] was [alleged actions], prompting them to open fire in self-defense.
However, [Name]’s family disputes this account, claiming that he was unarmed and posed no threat at the time of the shooting. They argue that he was targeted unjustly and are calling for a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death. The family emphasizes that [Name] was a peaceful activist who advocated for [cause] and had no history of violence.
The killing has sparked outrage among [Name]’s supporters, who are organizing [type of response, e.g., protests, vigils] to demand justice. They believe that [Name] was [motivation, e.g., targeted for his activism, mistaken identity] and are calling on [relevant authorities, e.g., IDF, international community] to hold those responsible accountable for his death.
The IDF has expressed condolences to [Name]’s family but maintains that their forces acted in accordance with protocols. They have promised to conduct an internal investigation into the incident to determine whether proper procedures were followed.
The death of [Name] comes amid ongoing tensions in the region, with [description of broader context, e.g., clashes between Israeli forces and Palestinian protesters, recent violence in the West Bank]. The situation remains tense as [description of potential future developments, e.g., calls for further protests, diplomatic efforts to address the conflict].
Sources:
– Statement from IDF spokesperson
– Statement from [Name]’s family
– Eyewitness accounts from the scene
Fact Check:
– [Name] was shot and killed at a checkpoint in the West Bank – Verified facts; widely reported by multiple sources.
– The IDF claims [Name] posed a threat and they acted in self-defense – Unconfirmed claims; conflicting narratives from different parties.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Family of Palestinian-American man killed in West Bank demand accountability”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.