Peru’s president impeached four months into term
Peru’s Congress has impeached President Pedro Castillo just four months into his term, citing his alleged incompetence in handling the country’s economic crisis. The impeachment vote took place on Friday in Lima, with 73 out of 130 legislators voting in favor of ousting Castillo.
The opposition accused Castillo of failing to revive the economy, which has been struggling with high unemployment rates and inflation. They argued that his government’s inability to implement effective policies to address these issues warranted his removal from office.
On the other hand, supporters of Castillo claim that the impeachment is a politically motivated move to destabilize the government and undermine his efforts to address income inequality and poverty in the country. Castillo, a former schoolteacher, ran on a platform focused on social reforms and tackling corruption.
Castillo’s impeachment has sparked both celebrations and protests across the country, reflecting the deep political divide among Peruvians. The country has faced political turmoil in recent years, with multiple presidents being impeached or resigning from office amid corruption scandals and economic challenges.
With Castillo’s removal, Congress leader Maria del Carmen Alva will assume the presidency until the next general elections in 2026. The future political landscape of Peru remains uncertain, as Castillo’s supporters vow to continue fighting against what they perceive as an attack on democracy.
Sources Analysis:
Peruvian Congress: The Congress has a vested interest in presenting the impeachment as a result of Castillo’s alleged incompetence to fulfill his duties as president.
Pedro Castillo Supporters: Supporters are likely to be biased towards defending Castillo and presenting the impeachment as a political maneuver by the opposition to remove him from power.
Opposition Politicians: They have a clear interest in removing Castillo from office and may present the impeachment as a necessary step to address Peru’s economic challenges.
Fact Check:
Impeachment of President Pedro Castillo – Verified facts: The impeachment vote took place on Friday, and 73 out of 130 legislators voted in favor of impeaching Castillo. These are verified facts reported by multiple sources.
Allegations of incompetence – Unconfirmed claims: The allegations of incompetence on Castillo’s part are subjective and depend on individual perspectives, making them unconfirmed claims.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Peru’s president impeached four months into term”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.