Protests over food shortages turn deadly in oil-rich Angola

‘The hungry can’t stay silent’ – behind deadly protests in oil-rich Angola

Protests erupted in the streets of Luanda, Angola, on Tuesday as demonstrators demanded government action to address food shortages and high living costs in the oil-rich nation. The protests, which turned deadly as clashes with security forces intensified, involved a mix of frustrated citizens and opposition groups.

The government, led by President Joao Lourenco, has acknowledged the challenges facing the country but has urged for calm and stated that it is working on solutions to improve the situation. The ruling MPLA party has emphasized the need for patience and dialogue to address the economic difficulties exacerbated by the global pandemic.

Opposition parties, such as UNITA and CASA-CE, have criticized the government’s response, accusing it of not doing enough to alleviate the suffering of the population. They have called for immediate measures to reduce food prices and increase access to basic necessities for the Angolan people.

The protests reflect growing discontent among Angolans who have been grappling with inflation, unemployment, and poverty, despite the country’s vast oil reserves. Angola is one of the largest oil producers in Africa, yet many of its citizens continue to face dire economic conditions.

As the situation unfolds, the international community is closely watching the events in Angola, hoping for a peaceful resolution to the crisis that is rooted in the fundamental right to food security and a dignified standard of living for all.

Sources Analysis:

Government sources – The government of Angola may have an interest in downplaying the severity of the protests to maintain stability and control. They could be biased in their portrayal of the events.

Opposition parties – Opposition parties in Angola have a vested interest in highlighting the government’s failures to address economic challenges and may exaggerate the impact of the protests to gain public support.

Fact Check:

Protests in Luanda – Verified facts. The occurrence of protests in the capital city is verifiable through various media reports and eyewitness accounts.

Government working on solutions – Unconfirmed claims. While the government states it is addressing the issues, the effectiveness of their actions is yet to be seen and verified.

Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘The hungry can’t stay silent’ – behind deadly protests in oil-rich Angola”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.

Scroll to Top