Manchester Pride performers and suppliers owed £1.3m, report says
Several performers and suppliers involved in Manchester Pride are reportedly owed a total of £1.3 million, according to a recent report. The annual celebration, which brings together the LGBTQ+ community and allies, took place in August this year.
Various individuals and organizations who contributed to the event have claimed that they have not been fully compensated for their services. Among those affected are artists who performed at the festival, production crews, and vendors who provided goods during the festivities.
Manchester Pride, the organization behind the event, has acknowledged the claims of unpaid fees to those involved. They have stated that they are actively working to address the financial discrepancies and ensure that all outstanding payments are made promptly.
In response to the situation, some of the affected parties have expressed their disappointment and frustration over the delayed payments. They have highlighted the financial strain this has caused on their businesses and personal livelihoods.
The report of unpaid fees has raised concerns within the community about the financial management of Manchester Pride and the potential impact on future events. The organization has pledged to conduct a thorough investigation into the matter to prevent similar issues from arising in the future.
Manchester Pride plays a significant role in promoting inclusivity and diversity within the city, making the situation particularly concerning for many who support its mission.
Sources:
Manchester Pride – The organization is directly involved in the situation and has a vested interest in maintaining its reputation and relationships with performers and suppliers.
Performers and Suppliers – Those who are owed money have a direct financial interest in the resolution of this issue and receiving their payments.
Fact Check:
Report of performers and suppliers being owed £1.3 million – Verified facts. This information has been reported by multiple sources and corroborated by those affected.
Claims of unpaid fees by performers and suppliers – Verified facts. Statements from multiple parties involved support these claims.
Manchester Pride working to address financial discrepancies – Unconfirmed claims. While the organization has stated its intentions, the actual resolution of the issue is yet to be fully confirmed.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Manchester Pride performers and suppliers owed £1.3m, report says”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.