In a surprising turn of events, a resident living in a high-rise apartment building in the city center has requested the council to buy back her flat due to exorbitant energy bills. The incident took place yesterday afternoon at the city council offices.
Ms. Johnson, the resident who made the unusual request, claimed that her energy bills had been steadily increasing over the past few years, making it extremely difficult for her to afford living in the apartment. She stated that despite her efforts to conserve energy, the bills kept soaring, putting a significant financial strain on her.
The city council, on the other hand, expressed surprise at the request, stating that such buyback requests are highly uncommon and would need to be thoroughly evaluated. A spokesperson for the council mentioned that while they sympathize with Ms. Johnson’s situation, the feasibility and implications of such a buyback would need to be carefully assessed.
Ms. Johnson is reportedly not the only resident in the building facing challenges with high energy costs. Several other residents have also voiced concerns about the escalating bills, sparking a broader discussion about the need for more sustainable and affordable energy solutions in the area.
The council has assured that they will look into the matter further and explore potential options to support residents facing similar issues. As of now, the request for the buyback of Ms. Johnson’s flat remains under review.
Sources Analysis:
Ms. Johnson – as the resident directly involved, she may have a biased view due to personal reasons and interests in seeking relief from high energy bills.
City Council – the council may have a vested interest in maintaining property ownership and would need to assess the financial and logistical implications of any buyback requests.
Fact Check:
Request for buyback of flat – Unconfirmed claim, pending further evaluation by the council to determine feasibility.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘My energy bills are so high I asked the council to buy back my flat'”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.