Russia’s answer to Eurovision is less kitsch, more Kremlin
Russia recently announced its own version of the popular Eurovision Song Contest, aptly named “Voice of the Country.” The competition will be organized by the Russian Public Television (ORT) and Channel One, in response to what they perceive as an overly Westernized and politically biased Eurovision.
ORT and Channel One stated that the new competition aims to showcase Russian musical talent without the “political agendas” that they claim have influenced Eurovision in recent years. They emphasized that “Voice of the Country” will be focused on the artists and their music, rather than extravagant costumes and theatrical performances often associated with Eurovision.
Critics, however, argue that the move is a strategic one by the Kremlin to further tighten its grip on the cultural sphere and promote a more conservative and nationalistic agenda. They point to the recent trend in Russia where various aspects of society, including media and arts, have been increasingly influenced or controlled by the government.
Despite the controversy surrounding its motives, “Voice of the Country” is set to debut in the near future, with the winner earning the opportunity to represent Russia at the next edition of Eurovision. It remains to be seen how this new competition will fare both in terms of viewership and reception, especially in comparison to the long-established Eurovision contest.
Sources Analysis:
ORT and Channel One – Both sources have ties to the Russian government and have been known to promote its interests in the past. Their goal in this situation is likely to assert more control over cultural events and promote a narrative aligned with the Kremlin’s agenda.
Critics – The critics are concerned about the potential political motivations behind the new competition and the broader trend of government influence in the cultural domain. Their goal is to raise awareness about these issues and foster discussion on the topic.
Fact Check:
The announcement of the new competition – Verified facts. This information has been officially announced by ORT and Channel One.
Critics’ concerns about government influence – Unconfirmed claims. While there is evidence of increased government control in various sectors, the exact motivations behind the new competition are not definitively proven.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Russia’s answer to Eurovision is less kitsch, more Kremlin”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.