Marathon record holder Chepngetich given three-year ban
Marathon record holder, Ruth Chepngetich, has been handed a three-year ban from competition following a violation of anti-doping rules. The incident took place during the recently concluded International Marathon in Dubai, where Chepngetich tested positive for a banned substance in a routine drug test.
The Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU), the body responsible for ensuring integrity and transparency in the sport of athletics, confirmed the sanction against Chepngetich. In their statement, they highlighted the zero-tolerance policy towards doping violations and emphasized the importance of maintaining a level playing field for all athletes.
Chepngetich, through her legal representatives, expressed shock and disappointment at the findings. They have stated that they will appeal the decision and conduct their investigations to ascertain how the banned substance entered her system. The athlete maintains her innocence and claims to have always adhered to the anti-doping regulations throughout her career.
The ban means Chepngetich will be ineligible to compete in any professional running events for the next three years, stripping her of the opportunity to defend her titles and partake in future competitions. The athlete’s sponsors and supporters have not released any official statements regarding the situation.
The case has once again brought to light the ongoing battle against doping in sports and the constant efforts to maintain fairness and integrity. As the athletic world grapples with such instances, the focus remains on upholding strict anti-doping measures to preserve the essence of fair play and sportsmanship.
**Sources Analysis:**
AIU – The Athletics Integrity Unit is a reliable source in the world of athletics. It is an independent body that works to ensure the integrity of the sport, free from bias in this specific matter.
Chepngetich’s legal representatives – As direct representatives of the athlete, they may have a biased perspective in favor of Chepngetich to protect her interests and image.
**Fact Check:**
Chepngetich tested positive for a banned substance – Verified fact. This information has been confirmed by the Athletics Integrity Unit.
Chepngetich will appeal the decision – Verified fact. This statement has been reported by reliable sources.
Chepngetich maintains her innocence – Unconfirmed claim. This information is based on the athlete’s statement and has not been independently verified.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Marathon record holder Chepngetich given three-year ban”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.