Germany’s far-right AfD suffers series of candidate deaths ahead of local vote
The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has been shaken by a series of candidate deaths in the lead-up to a local election. The incidents have raised concerns and speculation as the party prepares for the important vote.
The first incident occurred in Brandenburg, where a local AfD candidate was found dead in his home. Authorities have not ruled out foul play, but they are also considering the possibility of a personal motive.
Shortly after, another AfD candidate in Saxony-Anhalt was reported dead under similar mysterious circumstances. The police are investigating the case but have not disclosed any details yet.
The AfD has expressed shock and grief over the deaths of their candidates, emphasizing their condemnation of violence and calling for a thorough investigation. The party has highlighted the need for a secure political environment where such tragedies do not occur.
On the other hand, critics and political opponents have raised concerns about the far-right party’s rhetoric and its potential influence on public discourse. Some have suggested a connection between the candidates’ deaths and the party’s controversial stance on various issues.
With the upcoming local vote looming, the AfD faces a challenging situation with the loss of two of its candidates. The incidents have added a layer of complexity to an already contentious political landscape in Germany.
Overall, the circumstances surrounding the deaths of the AfD candidates remain unclear, and the investigations are ongoing.
—
Sources Analysis
Source 1: Local authorities – While generally considered reliable, local authorities may have limitations in providing unbiased information due to their involvement in the investigations.
Source 2: AfD party statements – The AfD has its own interests in shaping the narrative around the deaths of its candidates, potentially affecting the neutrality of their statements.
Fact Check
Fact 1: The deaths of the AfD candidates – Verified facts. The deaths have been reported by multiple sources.
Fact 2: Police considering foul play or personal motives – Unconfirmed claims. This information is based on ongoing investigations and has not been officially confirmed yet.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Germany’s far-right AfD suffers series of candidate deaths ahead of local vote”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.