Snapchat users are expressing dissatisfaction and anger over the platform’s upcoming fees for storing old photos and videos. The social media app recently announced that starting next month, users will be charged a fee to keep their saved Snaps in the Memories section for more than a year.
This move has sparked a backlash among many Snapchat users, with some taking to social media to voice their concerns. Many argue that they have been using the app for years under the impression that their saved content would remain accessible without any additional cost.
Snapchat, on the other hand, defends the decision by highlighting the costs associated with storing and maintaining old data. The platform asserts that the new fee structure will help ensure the sustainability of the service and allow for continued innovation.
As the implementation date approaches, tensions are running high among the user base, with some threatening to delete their accounts altogether in protest against the new policy.
The clash between Snapchat and its users underscores the challenges that social media platforms face in balancing user expectations with the need to generate revenue and cover operational expenses.
Sources Analysis:
– Snapchat: The company has a vested interest in justifying the new fee for storing old photos and videos to maintain profitability and sustain the platform’s operations.
– Snapchat users on social media: Users expressing frustration are directly impacted by the new policy and may have a bias against the platform’s decision.
Fact Check:
– Snapchat will start charging a fee for storing old photos and videos: Verified fact. This information has been confirmed by multiple sources.
– Users are threatening to delete their accounts in protest: Unconfirmed claim. While there are reports of user dissatisfaction, the extent of potential deletions cannot be definitively verified.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Snapchat users share fury at upcoming fees for storing old photos and videos”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.