Sudan has condemned Uganda for hosting the commander of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a paramilitary group accused of human rights abuses. Sudan’s Foreign Ministry described the visit of Lieutenant General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemeti, as an “affront to humanity.”
Hemeti, who is also the deputy head of Sudan’s sovereign council, traveled to Uganda for a three-day visit, where he met with Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni to discuss bilateral relations and regional security issues.
The RSF, a paramilitary group in Sudan, has faced allegations of committing human rights abuses, including the violent dispersal of pro-democracy protests in 2019. The group’s leader, Hemeti, has been accused of leading a brutal crackdown on protesters during the uprising that led to the ousting of former President Omar al-Bashir.
Sudan’s Foreign Ministry expressed its dismay over Uganda’s decision to host Hemeti, stating that it goes against the principles of justice and human rights. The ministry called on Uganda to hand over Hemeti to face justice for the alleged crimes committed by the RSF under his command.
In response, Uganda defended its engagement with Sudan, highlighting the need for regional cooperation on security issues and the importance of dialogue between neighboring countries. Uganda’s government has not issued any further comments on the matter.
The incident has strained relations between Sudan and Uganda, with Sudan accusing Uganda of undermining efforts to hold Hemeti accountable for his alleged actions. Meanwhile, Uganda maintains its stance on fostering regional partnerships for the sake of stability and security in the area.
The visit of Hemeti to Uganda has sparked controversy and raised questions about the responsibilities of host countries when hosting individuals accused of human rights violations. The situation remains tense as both countries navigate the diplomatic fallout from the visit.
Sources Analysis:
Sudan’s Foreign Ministry – The ministry is directly involved and has a vested interest in condemning Uganda for hosting Hemeti, given the allegations against the RSF.
Uganda Government – The Ugandan government is directly involved and has an interest in maintaining regional partnerships for security reasons, which influences its decision to host Hemeti.
Fact Check:
Hemeti’s visit to Uganda – Verified fact. This is confirmed by official statements and media reports.
Allegations of human rights abuses against the RSF – Verified fact. These allegations have been widely reported by various sources and human rights organizations.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘Affront to humanity’: Sudan slams Uganda for hosting RSF paramilitary boss”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.