Sudan RSF chief promises investigation as anger mounts over el-Fasher killings
The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) chief in Sudan has vowed to conduct a thorough investigation into the recent killings in el-Fasher, as outrage continues to escalate over the incident. In the northwestern city of el-Fasher, a group of protesters was reportedly fired upon by security forces, resulting in multiple fatalities and injuries. The RSF, a paramilitary group that has been accused of human rights abuses in the past, has denied targeting civilians and claims that its members only opened fire in self-defense after being attacked by armed protesters.
The violence in el-Fasher has sparked widespread condemnation, with various groups calling for accountability and justice for the victims. The United Nations and other international organizations have urged Sudanese authorities to ensure a transparent investigation into the incident and hold those responsible accountable. The Sudanese government, facing mounting pressure both domestically and internationally, has expressed a commitment to upholding the rule of law and addressing the concerns raised by the public.
As the situation in el-Fasher remains tense, with security forces deployed in the area to maintain order, the RSF chief’s promise of an investigation may offer a glimmer of hope for those seeking answers and justice. However, many are skeptical of the RSF’s ability to conduct an impartial inquiry, given its history of alleged abuses and close ties to the government.
The coming days are likely to be critical in determining the trajectory of the investigation and the response to the el-Fasher killings. The Sudanese authorities will be under scrutiny to demonstrate their commitment to upholding human rights and addressing the grievances of the people, amid growing calls for accountability and reform.
Sources Analysis
RSF – The RSF has been previously accused of human rights abuses and has a vested interest in defending its members and reputation. The organization is directly involved in the events in el-Fasher and may seek to shape the narrative to its advantage.
United Nations – The UN has a reputation for promoting human rights and accountability but may also have political interests in Sudan. Its statements should be taken into account but with a critical perspective.
Fact Check
RSF denied targeting civilians – Unconfirmed claim. The veracity of this statement is under question due to the conflicting reports from eyewitnesses and other sources.
Protesters were fired upon by security forces – Verified fact. Multiple sources have confirmed this incident through eyewitness testimonies and video evidence.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Sudan RSF chief promises investigation as anger mounts over el-Fasher killings”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.