Sudan’s army loses key city of el-Fasher to paramilitary RSF after 18-month siege
Sudan’s army has lost control of the crucial city of el-Fasher to the paramilitary group Rapid Support Forces (RSF) after an 18-month siege. The city, located in the Darfur region, fell to the RSF in a significant blow to the government forces.
The capture of el-Fasher marks a turning point in the conflict, with the RSF gaining a strategic stronghold in the region. The RSF, led by General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, has been accused of numerous human rights abuses in the past, including in Darfur.
The Sudanese army has acknowledged the loss of el-Fasher and stated that they are regrouping to launch a counter-offensive. They have emphasized their commitment to retake control of the city and restore stability in the region.
The RSF, on the other hand, has declared victory in el-Fasher and vowed to maintain peace and security in the city. General Dagalo stated that the capture of el-Fasher is a step towards bringing stability to Darfur and reiterated the RSF’s support for the transitional government.
The international community has expressed concern over the situation in el-Fasher, calling for a peaceful resolution to the conflict and urging both sides to prioritize the safety and well-being of civilians in the region.
The loss of el-Fasher to the RSF is expected to have far-reaching implications for the ongoing conflict in Sudan, with the potential to shift the balance of power in the region.
Sources Analysis
1. Sudanese Army – The Sudanese Army may have a bias in downplaying the loss of el-Fasher to save face and maintain morale within its ranks.
2. RSF – The RSF has a history of human rights abuses and could have a vested interest in controlling el-Fasher to expand its influence and power in the region.
Fact Check
1. Loss of el-Fasher to RSF – Verified fact. The Sudanese army has confirmed the loss of el-Fasher to the RSF.
2. 18-month siege – Verified fact. Multiple sources have reported the duration of the siege on el-Fasher.
3. RSF’s human rights abuses – Verified fact. The RSF has been widely accused of human rights violations in the past.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Sudan’s army loses key city of el-Fasher to paramilitary RSF after 18-month siege”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.