Sudanese Protestors Challenge Military Rule in Ongoing Crisis

In Sudan, recent events have unfolded as protestors take to the streets demanding an end to military rule. The crisis began on October 25th in the capital city of Khartoum, where security forces cracked down on peaceful demonstrators calling for civilian rule. The protestors, predominantly led by the Sudanese Professionals Association (SPA), have been advocating for a swift transition to civilian governance following the ousting of former President Omar al-Bashir in 2019.

The military, on the other hand, led by General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, declared a state of emergency and suspended the government, citing concerns over national security and stability. The military insists it is the only institution capable of steering the country towards free and fair elections, promising to hand over power to civilians once the situation is deemed suitable.

The African Union and other international bodies have condemned the military’s actions, urging for a peaceful resolution to the crisis and a swift return to civilian rule. The United States and European nations have also expressed concerns over the situation, emphasizing the need for dialogue and respect for human rights.

As tensions escalate, both sides remain entrenched in their positions, with the protestors vowing to continue their campaign until their demands are met, and the military showing no signs of backing down. The situation remains fluid, with the outcome uncertain as the country teeters on the brink of further instability.

Sources Analysis:
Sudanese Professionals Association (SPA) – The SPA has a history of advocating for civilian rule and democracy in Sudan, which could indicate a bias towards overthrowing military regimes.
General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan – As the leader of the military, General al-Burhan has a vested interest in maintaining control and authority, potentially influencing his statements and actions during the crisis.

Fact Check:
Protestors demand civilian rule – Verified fact. Demonstrated by the SPA-led protests and their articulated demands for civilian governance.
Military declares a state of emergency – Verified fact. Reported by multiple sources and confirmed by official statements from the military.
International bodies condemn military actions – Verified fact. Statements issued by the African Union and other global organizations have been widely reported and confirmed.

Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “A simple guide to what is happening in Sudan”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.

Scroll to Top