Sudan RSF chief promises investigation as anger mounts over el-Fasher killings
The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) chief in Sudan has pledged to conduct a thorough investigation into the recent killings that occurred in el-Fasher, as public outrage continues to escalate over the incident. The violence took place on Tuesday in the capital of North Darfur state, where at least six civilians were reportedly shot dead during a clash between security forces and protesters.
According to a statement by the RSF, the confrontation arose when a group of demonstrators gathered to protest against the rising cost of living and the economic crisis gripping the region. The RSF claims that its personnel fired live rounds into the air to disperse the crowd but did not target the protesters directly. Nonetheless, multiple eyewitnesses and local activists have disputed this narrative, alleging that the RSF members deliberately opened fire on the demonstrators.
In response to mounting pressure and condemnation, the RSF chief has committed to launching an investigation to determine the facts surrounding the tragic event. The Sudanese government has also expressed its concern over the incident and has called for accountability for those responsible for the killings. The United Nations and international human rights organizations have urged for a transparent and impartial inquiry into the matter to ensure justice is served.
The killings in el-Fasher have reignited longstanding tensions between the Sudanese security forces and the civilian population, with many demanding an end to the violence and human rights abuses in the country. As the investigation unfolds, the eyes of the public and the international community remain fixed on Sudan, awaiting the outcome of the probe and the actions that will be taken to address the grievances of the people.
Sources Analysis:
RSF – The RSF has been involved in various human rights abuses in Sudan and has a vested interest in shaping the narrative around the el-Fasher killings.
Eyewitnesses and local activists – While they may have firsthand accounts of the incident, their perspectives could be influenced by their opposition to the RSF and the Sudanese government.
Fact Check:
The number of civilians killed in el-Fasher – Unconfirmed claims. The exact number of casualties may vary until an official investigation is completed.
Protests were against the rising cost of living and economic crisis – Verified facts. These were the reported reasons behind the demonstration.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Sudan RSF chief promises investigation as anger mounts over el-Fasher killings”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.