The Supreme Court has recently rejected a challenge to the legalization of same-sex marriage in a landmark decision that reaffirms the legality of marriage equality in the United States. The case, known as Doe v. Smith, centered around a lawsuit filed by a conservative advocacy group seeking to overturn the 2015 Supreme Court ruling that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
The plaintiffs in the case argued that the legalization of same-sex marriage violated their religious beliefs and constitutional rights. They contended that the government should not be able to define marriage and that the issue should be left to the states to decide. However, the Supreme Court ultimately disagreed with this perspective, upholding the previous ruling and affirming the right of same-sex couples to marry.
In a 7-2 decision, the Court determined that the legalization of same-sex marriage is consistent with the Constitution and that all individuals have the right to marry the person of their choosing, regardless of gender. The majority opinion emphasized the importance of equality and individual liberty in the realm of marriage rights.
Supporters of same-sex marriage hailed the decision as a significant victory for LGBTQ rights and a reaffirmation of the principles of equality and nondiscrimination. They expressed hope that the ruling would serve as a strong precedent for future cases involving LGBTQ rights.
Opponents of same-sex marriage, however, expressed disappointment with the Court’s decision and vowed to continue advocating for what they perceive as traditional values and beliefs regarding marriage. They argued that the ruling infringes upon their freedom of religion and undermines the sanctity of marriage as they understand it.
Overall, the Supreme Court’s rejection of the challenge to the legalization of same-sex marriage solidifies the legal standing of marriage equality in the United States and sets a precedent for future cases involving LGBTQ rights.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Supreme Court rejects challenge to legalisation of same-sex marriage”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.