Taiwan coach apologises for ‘pressuring’ students to give blood
A coach in Taiwan has issued an apology after being accused of pressuring students to donate blood. The incident took place at a high school in Taipei last week. The coach, whose name has not been disclosed, allegedly urged members of the school’s track and field team to participate in a blood donation drive.
According to reports, some students felt uncomfortable with the coach’s request as they were concerned about their health and feared possible repercussions if they did not comply. The school administration has stated that there was no official blood donation activity planned at the school, and the coach acted on his own initiative.
In response to the backlash, the coach apologized for his actions, explaining that he intended to encourage altruism among the students but acknowledged that his approach was inappropriate. He emphasized that he did not intend to force anyone to donate blood and expressed regret for any distress caused.
The school authorities have assured that they are investigating the incident and will take appropriate measures to address the situation. They have also reminded staff members of the importance of upholding ethical standards and respecting students’ autonomy in such matters.
The case has sparked a debate about the boundaries of influence that coaches and teachers should have over students and the importance of ensuring that any requests made to students are voluntary and in line with their best interests.
Source 1 – Taiwan local news outlet: The source has a reputation for providing timely and accurate information on local events but may have a slight bias towards local interests.
Source 2 – School authorities: The school has a direct involvement in the incident and may have a vested interest in managing the situation promptly to maintain its reputation.
Fact 1 – Verified facts: The incident involving the coach pressuring students to give blood took place at a high school in Taipei last week. This information is based on multiple reports from reliable sources.
Fact 2 – Unconfirmed claims: Some students felt uncomfortable with the coach’s request due to concerns about their health and possible repercussions. While this is reported by various sources, individual feelings and perceptions cannot be definitively confirmed.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Taiwan coach apologises for ‘pressuring’ students to give blood”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.