Teachers want parents to stop giving children under 14 smartphones
In a recent development, a group of teachers from various schools have come together to urge parents to refrain from providing smartphones to children under the age of 14. The teachers argue that the early exposure to smartphones can have detrimental effects on the children’s social, emotional, and academic development.
The teachers emphasize that young children are not fully equipped to handle the potential dangers and distractions that come with smartphones. They express concerns about the negative impact on children’s ability to focus in the classroom, their physical health due to excessive screen time, and the risks associated with unsupervised internet access.
On the other hand, some parents defend their decision to give smartphones to their children, citing reasons such as safety concerns and the need to stay connected with their kids at all times. They argue that smartphones serve as a convenient way to communicate with their children and track their whereabouts.
Despite the differing viewpoints, both teachers and parents seem to have the best interests of the children at heart. However, finding a middle ground that ensures children’s safety and well-being while allowing them to benefit from technology remains a challenge.
The debate around the appropriate age for children to have smartphones is likely to continue as technology advances and plays an increasingly prominent role in young people’s lives.
Sources Analysis:
Teachers – The teachers involved may have a bias towards advocating for restrictions on smartphone use among children to create a better learning environment in schools.
Parents – Parents advocating for giving smartphones to children may have a bias towards ensuring their children’s safety and staying connected with them.
Fact Check:
The statement that teachers are urging parents to stop giving smartphones to children under 14 is a verified fact, as it is based on the teachers’ collective stance on the issue.
The concerns raised by teachers about the negative effects of smartphones on children’s development are categorized as unconfirmed claims, as the extent of these effects may vary among individuals and requires further research to establish definitive conclusions.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Teachers want parents to stop giving children under 14 smartphones”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.