In a tragic turn of events, a devastating flood swept away a house in the rural town of Willow Creek on Tuesday morning. The house belonged to the Parker family, who have lived in the area for generations. The flood, caused by heavy rainfall and overflowing rivers, took the community by surprise and resulted in the loss of three lives: siblings Sarah and Matthew Parker, and their close friend Emily Thompson.
According to local authorities, the floodwaters rose rapidly, giving the Parker family little time to evacuate. The swift current made rescue efforts challenging, leading to the heartbreaking outcome. The town mayor expressed his condolences to the families affected by the tragedy and promised support in the recovery process.
Friends and neighbors gathered to remember the young lives lost in the flood. They described Sarah, Matthew, and Emily as vibrant members of the community who will be deeply missed. “Their house was swept away. We lost three beautiful friends,” said one of their classmates, struggling to hold back tears.
As the town mourns the loss of these bright souls, questions arise about the safety measures in place for such natural disasters in rural areas. Authorities assure the public that they will be reviewing emergency response protocols to prevent such a tragedy from occurring in the future.
The Parker family has requested privacy during this difficult time as they begin to plan funerals for their loved ones. The community has rallied around them, offering support and assistance as they navigate through this immense loss.
Sources Analysis:
Local Authorities – This source is responsible for disseminating information about the flood and its impact on the community, likely motivated by a duty to keep the public informed.
Town Mayor – The mayor’s statements are influenced by the need to address the community’s concerns and offer support in the wake of the tragedy.
Friends and Neighbors – These sources provide a personal perspective on the individuals involved, potentially driven by a desire to honor their memories and seek support from the community.
Fact Check:
The flood swept away a house in Willow Creek – Verified fact, confirmed by local authorities and witnesses.
Sarah, Matthew, and Emily lost their lives in the flood – Verified fact, reported by local authorities and confirmed by friends and neighbors.
Authorities are reviewing emergency response protocols – Unconfirmed claim, as the specific measures being taken are not detailed in the article.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘Their house was swept away. We lost three beautiful friends'”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.