A Trump-appointed panel has approved the construction of a new ballroom at the White House. The panel, consisting of members appointed by former President Donald Trump during his time in office, gave the green light for the project to proceed. The new ballroom will be located on the east side of the White House and is said to provide a venue for hosting official events and ceremonies.
The decision to approve the White House ballroom project has been met with mixed reactions. Supporters of the project argue that it will enhance the White House’s ability to host important functions and improve its overall aesthetics. They believe that having a dedicated ballroom will be beneficial for diplomatic events and official gatherings.
On the other hand, critics have raised concerns about the cost of the project and whether it is necessary to allocate resources to build a new ballroom at the White House. Some have questioned the timing of the decision, considering the ongoing debates about government spending and budget priorities.
The exact timeline for the construction of the ballroom has not been disclosed yet. It is expected that further details regarding the project, including the budget and specific design plans, will be revealed in the coming months.
Overall, the approval of the White House ballroom project by the Trump-appointed panel reflects differing opinions on the significance and practicality of such a development within the White House premises.
Sources Analysis:
Trump-appointed panel – The panel members are likely to have been chosen based on their support for Trump’s policies and priorities. Their decision to approve the ballroom project may align with Trump’s vision for the White House.
Supporters and Critics – Supporters may include individuals or groups who see value in enhancing the White House facilities, while critics may have concerns about the project’s cost and necessity.
Fact Check:
Panel approval of the White House ballroom project – Verified facts. This information is confirmed and publicly available.
Construction location and purpose of the ballroom – Unconfirmed claims. While the location and purpose are likely accurate, specific details may change as the project progresses.
Reactions from supporters and critics – Statements that cannot be independently verified. The views of supporters and critics are subjective and can vary based on individual opinions.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Trump-appointed panel approves White House ballroom project”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.