President Trump discussed the possibility of firing the Federal Reserve Chairman, Jerome Powell, but it is deemed “highly unlikely” that such action will be taken, according to sources familiar with the matter. The discussion reportedly took place recently, raising concerns about the independence of the Federal Reserve from political interference.
The potential move to dismiss Powell comes after the Federal Reserve raised interest rates, a decision that Trump disagreed with as he perceives it could harm economic growth. However, legal experts have highlighted that the President’s ability to remove the Fed Chair is limited by law and could only be done “for cause.”
White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow stated that Trump is not planning to remove Powell from his position. Kudlow emphasized that the President acknowledges the limits of his authority in this matter and respects the independence of the Federal Reserve.
Powell, who was appointed by Trump to lead the Federal Reserve in 2018, has faced criticism from the President regarding the Fed’s monetary policy decisions. Despite their disagreements on interest rates, Powell has reiterated the Fed’s commitment to making decisions based on what is best for the country’s economy in the long run.
The news of Trump’s discussions about firing Powell has sparked debates about the importance of the Federal Reserve’s independence in making monetary policy decisions without political influence. The situation remains fluid, and further developments are awaited to see if any actions will be taken regarding Powell’s position as the Federal Reserve Chairman.
Sources Analysis:
Sources that have traditionally been critical of the Trump administration may have an interest in portraying the discussions in a negative light to further their agenda. White House officials may aim to downplay the situation to prevent market uncertainty and maintain stability. The Federal Reserve itself may seek to emphasize its independence and the importance of non-partisan decision-making to safeguard its credibility.
Fact Check:
The fact that Trump discussed the possibility of firing Powell is a verified fact reported by sources familiar with the matter. The statements by White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow affirming that Trump is not planning to remove Powell are confirmed. The concerns about the independence of the Federal Reserve from political interference are opinions based on the context of the situation and cannot be independently verified.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Trump discussed firing Fed boss but ‘highly unlikely’ he will”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.