Trump threatens to invoke Insurrection Act to quell anti-ICE protests in Minnesota
President Donald Trump has raised the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act to address the ongoing anti-ICE protests in Minnesota. The threats came after days of demonstrations against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency in the state.
The Insurrection Act, passed in 1807, allows the President to deploy active-duty military troops on U.S. soil to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, and rebellion. Trump tweeted that if local authorities in Minnesota do not “bring the Radical Left Mayor, and all others, to justice,” he would take action and invoke the act.
The protests in Minnesota have been primarily targeting ICE and its immigration enforcement policies. Demonstrators have been calling for the abolition of the agency, citing concerns over its treatment of immigrants and the separation of families at the border.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz responded to Trump’s threats, stating that the state is handling the situation and does not need federal intervention. Walz emphasized the importance of protecting the right to peaceful protest while maintaining public safety.
Critics of the President’s potential use of the Insurrection Act argue that deploying military forces against protesters would escalate tensions and undermine constitutional rights to assembly and free speech.
The situation remains tense as both sides are at a standstill, with Trump continuing to pressure local authorities to address the protests, and Governor Walz opposing the use of federal intervention.
Source Analysis:
The White House – The organization is directly involved in the issue and has a history of bias towards President Trump’s administration’s policies and actions. The White House’s interest lies in portraying Trump’s response to the protests in a favorable light.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz – Governor Walz is a key figure involved in the situation and has an interest in maintaining control over the state’s handling of the protests. His statements reflect his commitment to peaceful protest and public safety.
Fact Check:
The protests in Minnesota against ICE – Verified facts. Multiple sources have reported on the ongoing demonstrations against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency in Minnesota.
Trump’s threat to invoke the Insurrection Act – Verified facts. President Trump openly tweeted about the possibility of using the Insurrection Act to address the protests in Minnesota.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Trump threatens to invoke Insurrection Act to quell anti-ICE protests in Minnesota”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.