Trump says he discussed firing Fed chair but ‘highly unlikely’ he will
President Donald Trump recently acknowledged that he had discussed the possibility of firing Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. Trump made this statement during an interview, mentioning that he has the authority to remove Powell for not lowering interest rates as much as he desired. Despite these conversations, Trump highlighted that it is “highly unlikely” that he will dismiss Powell.
The discussion surrounding the potential firing of Powell took place at a time when the Federal Reserve is under pressure to support the U.S. economy amidst trade tensions and a global economic slowdown. Trump has been critical of Powell’s decisions on interest rates, often publicly expressing his disagreement with the Federal Reserve’s policies.
Powell, on the other hand, has emphasized the importance of the Fed’s independence in making monetary policy decisions based on economic data and analysis rather than political considerations. The potential dismissal of Powell could raise concerns about the central bank’s autonomy and fuel uncertainty in financial markets.
This latest development underscores the ongoing tensions between the White House and the Federal Reserve regarding economic strategy and policy decisions.
Sources Analysis:
The information for this article was primarily sourced from President Donald Trump’s interview statements. While Trump has shown a history of expressing his views openly and directly through various channels, including social media and interviews, his statements can be prone to being controversial and divisive.
Fact Check:
The fact that President Trump discussed the possibility of firing Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell is a verified fact as it was directly mentioned by Trump in a public interview. The statement that Trump finds it “highly unlikely” he will fire Powell is also a verified fact based on his interview comments.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Trump says he discussed firing Fed chair but ‘highly unlikely’ he will”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.