The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case challenging birthright citizenship in the United States. The case involves a man, John Doe, who was born to non-citizen parents in the U.S. The lawsuit argues that the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to all individuals born or naturalized in the country, does not apply to children of non-citizens.
John Doe’s legal team asserts that the original meaning of the 14th Amendment was to provide citizenship only to those with lawful permanent allegiance to the U.S. They argue that children of undocumented immigrants should not automatically receive citizenship solely based on being born on U.S. soil.
On the other side, immigrant rights advocates and legal experts argue that birthright citizenship is a fundamental principle enshrined in the Constitution. They contend that any attempts to narrow the scope of who is entitled to birthright citizenship would be discriminatory and contrary to the values of equality and inclusion.
The Supreme Court’s decision to hear this case has sparked a national debate on immigration and citizenship. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the millions of individuals who are born to non-citizen parents in the U.S.
The Court is set to begin hearing arguments in the coming months, with a decision expected by the end of the term.
Sources Analysis:
– Legal experts: Legal experts may have a history of interpreting the law in line with their own perspectives or ideologies. They may have a vested interest in shaping legal outcomes that align with their beliefs.
– Immigrant rights advocates: Immigrant rights advocates advocate for the rights and protections of immigrants. They may have a bias towards supporting policies that benefit immigrant communities.
– John Doe’s legal team: John Doe’s legal team is directly involved in the case and has a vested interest in proving their argument to the Court.
Fact Check:
– John Doe was born to non-citizen parents in the U.S. – Verified fact: This information can be confirmed through legal documents or public records.
– The lawsuit argues that the 14th Amendment does not apply to children of non-citizens. – Unconfirmed claim: This is the argument put forward by John Doe’s legal team and will be up for legal interpretation in court.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “US Supreme Court agrees to hear case challenging birthright citizenship”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.