A Uganda prison officer has been dismissed from his position for engaging in political activities on the social media platform TikTok. The officer, whose name has not been disclosed by the authorities, was found to be sharing videos expressing political opinions and views on various governance issues while in uniform.
The incident took place at a prison in Kampala, the capital city of Uganda, over the past few weeks. The videos posted by the officer went viral, attracting significant attention from the public and drawing scrutiny from his superiors. The Uganda Prisons Service confirmed the dismissal, stating that the officer’s actions were a violation of the institution’s code of conduct, which prohibits staff from engaging in political activities while on duty.
According to the officer in question, the videos were made during his personal time, and he did not intend to cause any harm or violate any regulations. He expressed regret over the situation and hoped for a reconsideration of his dismissal. On the other hand, the Uganda Prisons Service emphasized the need for its staff to uphold neutrality and professionalism at all times, especially when it comes to matters of politics and governance.
The case has sparked a debate on the boundaries of freedom of expression for public servants in Uganda and the appropriate use of social media platforms for personal opinions. It also raises questions about the extent to which individuals in positions of authority should engage in political discourse in a polarized social and political environment.
The officer’s dismissal serves as a reminder to public servants about the importance of adhering to organizational rules and regulations, particularly concerning political neutrality and the use of social media while representing government institutions. The Uganda Prisons Service has not indicated any further disciplinary actions beyond the officer’s termination.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Uganda prison officer sacked for ‘politicking’ on TikTok”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.