US blocks Gaza ceasefire statement at UN Security Council meeting

The United States has blocked a United Nations Security Council statement calling for a ceasefire in Gaza for the sixth time as the conflict in the region continues to escalate. The statement, which was proposed by Norway, Tunisia, and China, urged an immediate cessation of hostilities between Israel and Hamas to allow for the delivery of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people in Gaza.

The US, a close ally of Israel, once again prevented the statement from being adopted, arguing that it would not be conducive to ongoing diplomatic efforts to end the violence. US Ambassador to the UN, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, stated that the Biden administration is working tirelessly to end the conflict through diplomatic means and believes that a public statement at this time would not assist in achieving a sustainable peace.

On the other hand, Palestinian Foreign Minister Riyad al-Maliki criticized the US for blocking the statement, emphasizing the urgent need for international action to stop the bloodshed in Gaza. He called on the UN to take concrete steps to address the situation and protect Palestinian civilians from further harm.

Israel, for its part, has maintained that its military operations in Gaza are a response to the rocket attacks launched by Hamas and are aimed at destroying the group’s infrastructure. Israeli officials have expressed a commitment to ensuring the security of their citizens and have vowed to continue their operations until they deem it necessary.

The repeated blocking of the UN ceasefire statement by the US underscores the deep divisions within the Security Council on how to address the conflict in Gaza. The ongoing violence has already claimed the lives of hundreds of Palestinians and several Israelis, with no immediate end in sight.

Sources Analysis:

– United Nations: The UN is generally considered a credible source with a mandate to promote peace and security.
– United States: The US has a long-standing alliance with Israel, which may influence its stance on the conflict in Gaza.
– Palestinian Foreign Minister: As a Palestinian official, he likely has a vested interest in garnering international support for his cause.

Fact Check:

– The US blocked the UN Security Council statement on a Gaza ceasefire for the sixth time – Verified fact. This information can be confirmed through official statements and records.
– The statement was proposed by Norway, Tunisia, and China – Verified fact. This information can be verified through official sources and news reports.

Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “US blocks UN call for Gaza ceasefire for sixth time”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.

Scroll to Top